Finally, the administration of Prime Minister Meles Zenawi
comes around to surrender that inflation is unlikely to come
down to single digit anytime soon. It ought to be a
disconsolate moment for Meles, reports ABDI TSEGAYE, FORTUNE
STAFF WRITER
At the ruling party’s convention held in Hawassa (Awassa)
back in September 2008, a macroeconomist, Eyob
Tesfaye (PhD), had argued that the administration of
Prime Minister Meles Zenawi should rather consider a
macroeconomic environment where there would be a
double digit growth blended with double digit
inflation.
Then head of state financial institutions
supervisory agency, Eyob stood opposite to many who
had argued that it would be possible to ensure
double digit growth in gross domestic products
(GDP), while taming inflation below 10pc. The Prime
Minister was among this incredulous group. For far too long, he tried to sway the nation that
it was a matter of time before his administration
arrests what Bulcha Demekissa, an opposition figure,
describes as “galloping inflation.” Not anymore
though.
Inflation has been out in the woods for the past
seven years, with the consumer price index (CPI),
measured by the federal statistics agency, showing
occasional but rare drops to single digits in
between. It is proven to be an elusive and a moving
target, eroding whatever gains the administration
claims to have gained in the fight against poverty.
Last week was a rather disconsolate moment for the
Prime Minister, who appeared before Parliament for
question time. Avoiding the media for a little over
a year now, it was his third appearance since March
2011 - the last time he had held a press conference
- where he has accepted, for the first time,
inflation is very unlikely to be contained within
single digit horizon.
“Our plan of bringing inflation down to a single
digit in June 2012 has come improbable and may be
carried to the months of either August or September
while the inflation stays on a constant downward
trend,” Meles said last week. It was a rare admission from a person whose hopes
hinged on low inflation for over five years. “A stock of reality has downed on him,” said a
macroeconomist working for the administration.
Although the Prime Minister said his
administration’s bid to bring inflation down to
single digit has moved on to September, the
macroeconomist foresees that it is unrealistic to
expect this to happen anytime in the next three
years. It was a moment of surrender to what Meles has
declared on Tuesday, April 2012, “enemy number one”;
his second pronouncement since 2008. “The high cost of living is among the scorching
issues of the time [in Ethiopia] and probably the
main one,” Meles said.
What many economists within and outside the
administration see as a “runaway” inflation has been
on the upward trend since 2005, hovering at
year-on-year moving average of 35pc. Hardly is there any debate about the phenomenon of
inflation in an economy which Syed Nuru (PhD), a
researcher with the Ethiopian Economic Association (EEA),
described as moving from low base and stagnation of
the pre-2000 years to a growth trajectory that has
unleashed consumers’ demand. Indeed, the economy has
enjoyed its best spell in the country’s modern
economic history, with medium and long term
prospects for growth remaining positive.
Nevertheless, what is seen as the most daring policy
decision the administration has taken in spending
tens of billions of dollars in building the nation’s
physical infrastructure has its own downside. The
very policy drawn to help stimulate the economy and
lift the nation out of poverty is inflationary in
its nature, according to a macroeconomist who works
in a private consultancy. Not surprisingly, the source of Ethiopia’s inflation
remains an issue of debate, for the administration
continues to argue that the fiscal expansionary
macroeconomic environment is hardly the source.
Persuaded by his macroeconomic advisors - comprising
of Newayab Gebrekirstos, Hashim Ahmed and Michael
Merid - Meles has been on the record arguing that
the source of inflation could be several, but mainly
imported due to price escalation in the
international market. He also blames the
inefficiency of the market, which he sees is
dominated by oligopolies who he blames for creating
an artificial shortage of basic goods such as edible
oil and sugar.It took the administration’s macroeconomic advisors
more time to concede Ethiopia’s inflation is also
monetary phenomenon. Meles zoomed last week the
sources down to imported inflation, the
uncompetitive market structure, and excessive broad
money supply spiraling inflation, while he also
mentioned inflationary expectations by market agents
as another.
But the Prime Minister and his macroeconomic team
remain adamant in rejecting that the
administration’s primary focus in supporting growth
and the central bank’s inability to use monetary
policies independent of the policy priorities of the
political establishment is perhaps the main source. “Predominantly, the problem is an unwise monetary
policy that is made subservient of the fiscal
policy,” a macroeconomist, who requests anonymity,
told Fortune.The administration has ballooned its spending for
public infrastructure from 30 billion Br in 2005/06
to 35.4 billion Br in 2006/07, and 57.8 billion Br
in 2008/09, allowing a record spending on public
infrastructure, according to the International
Monetary Fund (IMF).
It is this policy of pursing massive public
investment as a way of developing the nation’s
physical infrastructure in roads, energy, and
telecom that puts the administration in collusion
course with the IMF; the latter believes such policy
would undermine Ethiopia’s balance of payments
position. Indeed, its current account deficit of
4.3pc to GDP in 2007 surged back to 7.7pc in 2009,
and 10.4pc in the subsequent year, one of the
largest in the world.Seen as very inflationary, this is likely to
continue.
Ethiopia’s overall balance of payments position is
likely to remain deep in the red in the medium term
as rising exports returns continue to be outpaced by
higher import receipts, according to a study an
international firm released in February 2012.
And much of these imports, including oil, are made
by state enterprises such as the utility companies,
which are massively borrowing from the state owned
commercial bank, thus neutralizing the
administration’s pledge that it would not borrow
from the central bank. “The government should have said it wouldn’t borrow
from all domestic banks,” said the macroeconomist
who is in private consultancy. The administration does not have the apatite to
scale down both its borrowing from domestic sources
and its fiscally expansive growth policy. So is
inflation projected to remain in double digit for
many months to come.
Nonetheless, what shocked many studying Ethiopia’s
economy was that prices were thought to subside
between December and March, as they normally do, for
it is the season when produces come out to the
market. Although the administration hastily took
solace from a marginal drop in inflation by 4.2pc,
when comparing the 36.3pc in March 2011 to the March
of this year, the picture was different when it is
compared to February 2012; it galloped by a
staggering 17.5pc.
Last week, Meles attributed this surprising increase
less to drop in agricultural production and more on
inflationary expectations held by market players who
panicked by the late arrival of the Belg rain.“The price of grains has gone up in the month of
February mainly due to the fact that until recently
the Belg rain has been late, leading all agents -
including farmers - to hold the expectations that
price for grains will rise, thereby kept grains from
the market in anticipation of better future price,”
he told Parliament that is almost fully dominated by
MPs from his party.
There is an exception. Girma Seyfu, a lone
opposition voice in Parliament representing MEDREK,
says Ethiopia’s inflation is deeply structural, and
where no amount effort in controlling prices of
edible oil and sugar can fend off. “The source is in supply constraint,” Girma told the
Amharic weekly NegadRas. “We’ve memorized the list
of sources the government has been hammering.
Domestic productivity remains low; this is a country
with vast arable land but imports wheat from
abroad.”
The Prime Minister was not up for such back and
forth. There was hardly any challenge to his
assumptions and arguments, but only responded to
stock of questions on assortment of issues MPs
raised from emerging tensions with Eritrea and
Ethiopian soldiers involvement in Somalia to
dissatisfaction of teachers over pay as well as a
narrowing political space. He left the floor after
responding to several of them, but none of them made
him appear in despair as the runaway inflation does.
Source: Addis Fortune
No comments:
Post a Comment