Source: Reporters Without Borders
Reporters Without Borders is very worried to learn that access to the
Amharic website of Ethiopia’s leading independent, privately-owned
weekly, The Reporter, has been blocked for the past five days. No one has been able to access the site from within Ethiopia since around 4:30 p.m. on 21 April unless they use a proxy server.
The reason for the blocking is unclear and Reporters Without Borders
urges the authorities to provide an explanation. “Everything indicates
that the blocking is being carried by the state-owned company
Ethio-Telecom, since it is Ethiopia’s only Internet Service Provider,”
the press freedom organization said. Media Communication Centre (MCC), the company that publishes The
Reporter, has asked Ethio-Telecom for an explanation but has not yet
received a response.
“Website blocking is not new in Ethiopia but a leading independent
newspaper’s site has never previously been affected,” Reporters Without
Borders said. “Tests carried out by the OpenNet Initiative in 2008 and
2009 showed that certain outspoken or opposition sites based abroad were
the target of filtering, but this is the first time a newspaper such as
The Reporter has been targeted.”
The Reporter’s site normally has upward of 30,000 visitors a day,
more than five times the number of readers of the print version. “Has
The Reporter’s site been blocked to prevent the dissemination of
sensitive articles,” Reporters Without Borders asked. Reporters Without Borders urges the authorities to restore access to
the site for Ethiopian Internet users and reiterates its opposition to
the filtering and blocking of online content.
Its view is shared by of the United Nations special rapporteur for
freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, who recommended in a
June 2011 report that the flow of information online should be
restricted to “few, exceptional, and limited circumstances prescribed by
international human rights law.” He also said “the right to freedom of
expression must be the norm, and any limitation considered as an
exception.”
No comments:
Post a Comment