By Julio Godoy, Source: IPS
The mass acquisition or lease
of arable Farmland in developing countries, especially in Africa, by
foreign investors – a practice aggravated by the outbreak of the
financial crisis in 2007 – has reached record highs, according to
several new studies.
A study
by the Spain-based group Genetic Resources Action International
(GRAIN), released late February, estimates that some 35 million hectares
of land have been sold or leased in 416 recent, large-scale land
grabbing deals in 66 countries, mostly in Africa.
Another analysis
of land grabs, carried out by the International Land Coalition (ILC),
released last January, found that between 2000 and 2010 some 203 million
hectares were leased or sold in developing countries, mainly in Africa,
but also in Latin America, Asia, and even Eastern Europe, to foreign
investors.
“This land area is equivalent to over eight times the size of the
United Kingdom,” the ILC said in its report ‘Land Rights and the Rush
for Land – Findings of the Global Commercial Pressures on Land Research
Project.’
Most land is used to produce inputs for so called biofuels, ILC pointed out. In his new book on the subject, award-winning Italian journalist
Stefano Liberti says that this massive global land grab is the direct
consequence of the privatisation and liberalisation policies imposed for
years upon developing countries by international financial institutions such as the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and investment in agricultural policies promoted by United Nations agencies such as the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO).
The book, published originally in Italian under the title ‘Land
Grabbing: How the market for land is creating a new colonialism’, was
released in German on Apr 18, with English and Spanish editions under
way.
Liberti told IPS that most governments in developing countries affected by land grabbing are also accomplices in the process.
“In many African countries in particular, land belongs to the state,”
Liberti said. “Governments are dealing secretly with investors, to
lease or sell enormous areas of the best arable land. Local farmers who
don’t own the land they work are informed of these deals at the very
last moment, when they are told to leave,” Liberti said.
During the preparation of his book, Liberti travelled across Africa,
and attended numerous seminars and sessions of international
institutions, such as the FAO and the WB, and participated in workshops
organised by small farmers’ organisations around the world.
Liberti said that the most spectacular cases of land grabbing he came
across were in Ethiopia. “This country has been suffering from famine
for decades, due to armed conflicts and droughts. And yet, it has been
leasing or selling its best land to foreign investors for almost nothing
at all to produce food or inputs for biofuels to be consumed abroad,”
Liberti said.
In his book, Liberti illustrates the case of an Indian company, which
leases 300,000 hectares of Ethiopia’s best arable land for one dollar
per year per hectare, to produce wheat, palm oil, and sugar for mostly
Indian consumption. “Ethiopians have almost nothing from this deal,” Liberti said. “The
company pays extreme low salaries to its Ethiopian workers, almost
nothing for the land, enjoys tax breaks for the import of technology,
and on top of that uses the country’s water for free.”
Indeed, the Ethiopian Investment Agency, the state office
administering foreign direct investment (FDI), praises the country’s
labour costs as “relatively low compared to the African average.”
According to Liberti, foreign agricultural industries in Ethiopia pay
their workers less than a dollar a day. The Ethiopian case is typical of the land grabbing phenomenon across the developing world. In a recent case in Algeria, the Abu Dhabi-based Al Qudra Holding
obtained concessions for 31,000 hectares of agricultural land, on which
it intends to produce potatoes, olives and dairy products, all for
export.
The company is also planning similar land leasing investments in
Morocco, Pakistan, Syria, Vietnam, Sudan and India to increase its land
holdings to 400,000 hectares. Liberti said that holdings such as Al Qudra, and investment funds,
including pension funds, are the main actors in the global land grab.
“The international financial sector discovered some five years ago that
it can earn substantial amounts of money by speculating with food
stuffs,” he said.
Holdings and sovereign wealth funds, which manage the currency
reserves of many Arab and other strong, emerging economies also invest
massively in land grabbing, to guarantee food supply in their home
markets.
According to estimations by GRAIN, “Pension funds currently juggle 23
trillion dollars in assets, of which some 100 billion are believed to
be invested in commodities.”
Of this money in commodities, five to 15 billion are reportedly going
into farmland acquisitions. “By 2015, these commodity and farmland
investments are expected to double,” GRAIN estimated last year. Liberti said that international institutions such as the WB and the FAO are accomplices in the land grab. “The FAO used to say that agriculture needed massive private
investment to improve efficiency. The WB and the (IMF), for their part,
promoted privatisation and liberalisation of food markets, and gave
impulse to land grabbing.”
“The WB has even lent money and provided insurance to investment funds taking part in land grabbing,” Liberti added. Yet another driver of the land grab is an explosion in the use of
so-called biofuels. As the ILC report points out that of all the many
deals resulting in land theft, “Seventy-eight percent are for
agricultural production, of which three-quarters are for biofuels.” Mineral extraction, industry, tourism, and forest conversions are
also significant contributors, adding up to the remaining 22 percent.
ILC Director Madiodio Niasse told IPS that governments in developing
countries must “understand that there are alternative investment models
that do not necessarily involve them giving away their land.” Niasse, a Senegalese national, has been the director of ILC since
2005. He told IPS that it is essential for African governments to
conceive “their own rural development strategies to serve their national
priorities and the interests of their people.”
“During my research trips in Africa, I came across posters against
the land grab deals,” Liberti told IPS. “One said: ‘Future generations
will damn your graves, because you did not leave them any land.’” To avoid this future, Liberti stressed, “An efficient agricultural
model, an alternative to the agro- industrial (framework) in practice
now, must be developed for Africa, Latin America, and Asia.”
Foreign investment in agriculture was invited based on the misguided
assumption that it would help local communities; now, “the opposite is
actually happening.”“The alternative is to support local farmers by teaching them modern
methods of sustainable agriculture, and providing infrastructure for
irrigation, storage, transportation, and technical inputs,” Liberti concluded.
